The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the experiment that completed in I think it ran I I can't remember exactly I think it ran about five years in 1973 showed no difference there was no difference in cardiac events despite the fact that the group that was on the higher polyunsaturated fat group did indeed have much lower cholesterol levels
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
obviously in 1973 he completes a study the Min Minnesota coronary experiment um I I actually find this to be one of the most difficult studies to interpret not so much the one that he published 16 years later by the way in 1989 but the one that Chris Ramden republished just a couple of years ago based on all of the data from France's study Plus data he never published