Peter Attia· MD
the number of ldl particles is a more accurate index of risk than the ldl cholesterol
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the number of ldl particles is a more accurate index of risk than the ldl cholesterol
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the first order term is still going to be the number of particles that's the biggest driver of risk and everything else factors into it in other words that's not an independent risk because it's driven by the the residence time of the LDL which is driven by the clearance rate