We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
and in the metaanalysis invariably with regard to seed oils and here there's an example with statins there are studies that are done very poorly that should be excluded and nobody's saying that they're just saying look at the weight of the evidence the sum of the evidence the majority of the evidence which is in my opinion it's just a a shelter for badly done science and it's lazy way to make a decision in medicine and it leads to bad decision
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.