The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
both early menarchy before the age of 11 and also late menarchy after the age of 17 has been associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk later in life and there's likely hormonal and adipocine and cardiometabolic imprinting that's related to this
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
both early menarchy before the age of 11 and also late menarchy after the age of 17 has been associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk later in life and there's likely hormonal and adipocine and Hearty metabolic imprinting that's related to this