The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Eventually, within a 10-year period, we learned so much because it was, I think, 1988 that ISIS-2 was published. And ISIS-2 was the, this is off the top of my head, but I think it was a comparison of aspirin and streptokinase. versus aspirin alone in patients who presented with heart attack.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.