The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the broad institute at harvard mit paper which i think was in cell and identified about a hundred genes um but the common denominator was they seem to be all involved in early fetal brain development all and all except for one in the cortex of the brain most involved in early excitatory and inhibitory neurons and a lot of them in the neuronal cytoskeleton
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.