The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So we know autophagy matters a lot in the brain. If you delete autophagy, and really Mitsushima was the person who kind of made autophagy interesting to lots of people. And it was award of the Nobel Prize. No, no, he wasn't. Oh, he wasn't. Shumi was. But he didn't share. He didn't know that, which I think was a bit of an oversight in my view. But anyhow, he basically studied autophagy in the brain, made mutations, showed you got neurodegeneration, right?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So we know autophagy matters a lot in the brain. If you delete autophagy, and really Mitsushima was the person who kind of made autophagy interesting And it was awarded the Nobel Prize. No, no, he wasn't. Oh, he wasn't? Well, Shumi was for original... Oh, he didn't share. He didn't, which I think was a bit of an oversight in my view. But anyhow, he basically studied autophagy in the brain, made mutations, showed you got neurodegeneration, right?
what we noticed when we looked at the mouse the laktaw Thapa G when weijin ethically deleted the autopsy gene in the adult mouse was that there were tissues like the brain that were very sensitive and there were other tissues like the lungs that didn't have any phenotype
suggesting that the role of etaf AG in preventing neuro degeneration is essential