Paul Saladino· MD
and generally riboflavin is poorly found in plants and again that's another way to kind of reconstruct this diet and think where are you gonna get your riboflavin from your plants good luck
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and generally riboflavin is poorly found in plants and again that's another way to kind of reconstruct this diet and think where are you gonna get your riboflavin from your plants good luck
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in terms of riboflavin by itself I think a carnivore is gonna have way better riboflavin status than a vegan and omnivores are gonna be in the middle because it's just the case that most of the best riboflavin I mean even in even you know even excluding the organ meats if you if you borrow organ meats from consideration most of the good riboflavin sources are animal foods