The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
most of what follows it's like there's there are some plant foods in there but it's they're not I don't carve or diets should be pretty good in riboflavin but as you indicated I think what you said is true and I think it's just a that's more of a fact of just everybody across the board has marginal riboflavin status and if you have factors and increased riboflavin needs most people regardless of their diet are probably not getting enough
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.