The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
We've seen guys come back with estradile levels of, you know, we're using like say Boston heart and which is using an enzyme based system and they'll come back and they'll have an estradile of 100 and we're like this this can't be right and then you send them to lab core and specify LCMS and you you get that they're at 31.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the enzyme based test it was 41.3 so that's more than a 2X difference yeah the enzyme based testing will cross detect estrone synthetic estrogens as estrad