The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you don't see it on gi maps you don't see it when you do these things everyone hundreds of gi maps and i've really never seen a worm not once i've seen one amoeba one amoeba and this lady who was really sick and didn't feel good who knows where she got she probably didn't get it for me so i got from water it was entertainment histolytica i've seen one amoeba i've never seen a round worm i've never seen a fluke i've never seen a tapeworm hundreds of gi maps
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.