The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
i think that there there's all of the reference ranges are based on the population and if the population is shifted toward low iron which most of our population is it's going to look low just like the population is probably shifted toward low ldl
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so the population ranges are skewed you know you're looking at the reference range which is two standard deviations outside of that of the mean
I basically just disregard all the reference ranges when I look at labs and I kind of have my own set of standards that are based on my belief system around what should and shouldn't be the case physiologically