We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I have been um pretty negative um based on the data i just have not seen the data that suggests to me that um we're and is this on the sensitivity front yes yeah — and so I'm Can AI help us possibly possibly it seems it the problem is just really hard
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I have been um pretty negative um based on the data. I just have not seen the data that suggests to me that um we're and is this on the sensitivity front? Yes. Yeah. Yeah. Um and so I'm Can AI help us? Possibly. Possibly. It seems it the problem is just really hard.