We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
and they've you know they've looked at accuracies of garments and whoops and or like you don't get very good accurate data at all as you've seen when you're doing exercise and even when you're doing somewhat cyclical exercise you can still get as you've seen completely garbage numbers that make no sense because the centor just can't pick up the the blood flow very accurately
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And those readings alone can drift significantly. And I I I went down the rabbit hole on this a year ago of looking at every single one of the wristbased heart rate monitors and I was blown away at how um how inaccurate wristbased uh heart rate monitors were.