The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you went and did that exercise 50 years ago you'd see a much lower number probably 25 to 30 um so is it that the liver has changed from an evolutionary perspective in 50 years probably not it seems more likely that we've seen more drift towards liver injury
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the lab uh any one of your audience members who's looking at their own lab the labs often times flag them now when they're in the upper 40s or 50s
in terms of um women and men what we expected their AA trans races what we would consider abnormal