The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
we look at the blood creatinine concentration and we can calculate what's called an EGFR an estimated glomerular filtration rate which is the amount of plasma that is being filtered through the glomerulus which is a micro scopic structure in the kidney and gives us an occasion of how well the kidneys are working
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
yeah there's a couple of calculations um mine has been very high 1:21 the estimated optimal range is greater than 60 so you ones with kidney function you won your EGFR to be high so you won either the rate at which your glomeruli which are these little magical units and your kidneys that do all the filtering you want that flow rate in the kidney to be high so it's not a bad thing inside that's saying hey your kidneys filtering a lot of junk out that's what we want
so you ones with kidney function you won your EGFR to be high so it's not a bad thing inside that's saying hey your kidneys filtering a lot of junk out that's what we want
if you look at the systatin Seas that I've gotten in the past they're normal my kidneys work great