The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
PSA is a is a protein it exists to Aid in the liquefication of semen so it's produced by the prostate and if one were to um measure PSA in semen it would be very very high I always tell people if you looked at PSA in the semen it would be I don't know 100,000 nanog per milliliter of PSA in semen it's designed to be there and it exists there to ify the semen to help in the process of fertilization
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.