We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
and in fact speaking with him you know and I'm not going to mention any brand or anything but looking at high variability someday you say like look today it told me that I was fatigued that algorithm and I went out there and beat my record right um and the clim obviously I'm not fatigued you know and other other days it tells you you're in top form and and ah I feel a more fatigued you know so this is what these algorithms we we need to be careful sometimes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.