The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
my colleague David Ferman is this this thing called I age which is a immune aging set of uh test that you can actually uh conduct um that was the first attempt at trying to measure immune aging you know they have a whole bunch of what do they actually measure is it all serum biomarkers yes serum biomarkers and mostly cytoines CXC validated how uh been validated in clinical studies.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.