The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
that allows you quickly to with quickly being within six months to a year to know whether your anti-aging manipulation alleged anti-aging manipulation has moved them to a physiological status which is associated with slower aging
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and it does so in youth which is the key point so if it does so quickly after an anti-aging drug is administered that's the transition that's the bridge you need for clinical studies in people
the speedometer tells you how fast your car is going and so what we need and what I think we're just beginning now to to document is things like the speedometer aging rate indicators that reliably discriminate slow aging myor people from regular old Meer people
we have now a dozen or so things that change in the fat in the blood in the liver in the brain and in the muscle that are always changed in any slow aging Mouse whether it's drug a drug B drug C calor restriction diet or single gene mutations