The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a biomarker generically is something that's easy to measure that you is informative about something that's hard to measure a classical example famous example is you want to know how many cigarettes somebody smokes a day they'll lie to you but if you measure cine in their blood that's a byproduct of nicotine you don't have to ask them you can find out how many cigarettes they had in the last couple of days by measuring blood coat that's a biomarker of of cigarette consumption
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.