The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
he did have elevated transaminases... it wasn't until he had an MRI for an unrelated reason that they noticed the amount of iron accumulation in his liver and of course he had hemocromatosis that had somehow been previously undiagnosed and he had accumulated enough iron in his liver that it was actually beginning to show these signs of injury through the elevation of transaminases
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.