The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
whereas many things that are complex you can you know you can't measure you know the number of lipoproteins or something like that because that requires NMR it's a very separate test you can't even measure insulin you know either gonna do it through a radio immune assay or you're gonna do it through multiple washes something called an Eliza paste assay where you have to rinse and repeat and stuff like that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.