Peter Attia· MD
So in that case, back then, and again, it's changed now, but back then, if you had chest pain and the EKG changes, but you didn't have a rise in the biomarker, you were said to have unstable angina.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So in that case, back then, and again, it's changed now, but back then, if you had chest pain and the EKG changes, but you didn't have a rise in the biomarker, you were said to have unstable angina.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.