The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what emerged from that research was a ratio of copper to cerulo plasma of 333 okay and what I've learned is that when the number is above 3.33 the copper is a little higher than it should be coplas is a little lower than it should be it's a it's a a thumbnail if you will that there's inflammation in the system and if the number is below 3.33 it means that there just isn't enough copper in their diet
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
well what I did was I developed a cerulo plasma to uric acid ratio so think of C cerulo plasma as a a poor man's indication of copper status especially in the mitochondria right and so that should be 30 uric acid should be four so we should be ratio should be 7.5