The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
there's node to be among those who will truly understand that HDL particle number is your best match available metric on quantifying the number and that is a better metric than guessing that using HDL cholesterol or LDL cholesterol
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
since there's almost no more debate that the best metric for our LDL particles is low-density lipoprotein particle number there's node to be among those who will truly understand that HDL particle number is your best match available metric on quantifying the number
there's no debate that the best metric for our LDL particles is low-density lipoprotein particle number
i see no need to follow your non-hdl cholesterol following april b because i'd be a fool if i told you i normalized your non-hdl cholesterol and i've eliminated your lipoprotein mediated risk until you measure the quantity of these particles