The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in the earlier days we we sort of said 19 and 30 were our thresholds um in terms of um women and men what we expected their AA trans races what we would consider abnormal um the lab uh any one of your audience members who's looking at their own lab the labs often times flag them now when they're in the upper 40s
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I do want to make sure that you know thresholds for sort of workups Etc we still think about being around 40 so this is it's also pertinent to you so the questions I would ask just with that pattern in and of itself is curiously um did you work out within 24 hours of that um laboratory assay