The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are what are called na e values the net a C's create excretion values and there are the way that these are calculated we don't have to go through the exact calculation but it takes into account sodium potassium calcium magnesium chloride phosphate sulfate and organic acids or specifically it's a balance between the alkalinizing minerals that I was talking to you guys about and protein
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's another paper potential renal acid load of foods and its influence on pH and basically what you'll see in the calculation of prowl which is the potential renal acid load or the net acid excretion the na e sometimes called the N e a si is that we balanced protein by you including these alkalinizing minerals in our diets