The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I only actually have one direct LDL test and that was came back at 5:04 the others can only say greater than 350 right and this is milligrams per deciliter and again when you had that 504 for your LDL what was your HDL HDL there was 97 your triglycerides were 72
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I do not because I have pre keto numbers which show that and I've also done a whole genome sequence and I have no interesting lipid metabolism genes right so just for people listening they will hear that familial hypercholesterolemia is a genetic issue it's a genetic polymorphism there are many polymorphisms which can occur for familial hypercholesterolemia over 2,000 but you do not have any of those on your whole genome sequencing not that I've been able to find I only looked at 300 or 350 that were tied to lipid metabolism that I could find but nothing interesting but to have an LDL of 81 prior to this suggest you do not have familiar and my family members prior to their low carb diets also had normal cholesterol so there's no familial aspect either