The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
one of the genetic markers and i forget what it is you might know it but dr forsman was like oh well this kind of already shows you're a thick blooded person so the fact that you have this extra fibrinogen and you know i had stick thicky blood like a diabetic the phlebotomist could barely get it out had to stop and be like i can't take any more blood that's not good
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
one of the genetic markers and i forget what it is you might know it but dr forsman was like oh well this kind of already shows you're a thick blooded person so the fact that you have this extra fibrinogen and you know i had stick thicky blood like a diabetic