The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
just realize the reference ranges on a provoked mean essentially nothing you don't know what is normal unprovoked and i think everyone on a provoke is going to go high so if you're not if you haven't seen a lot of provoked heavy metal testing you don't even know what the reference range is and i'll tell you that like when i've tested people provoked almost everyone is going to be outside of the reference range
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.