The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I had my lipids done in February of 2019 at that time my LDL particle number was 1637 and my let me see if they had HDL in here I see your HDL PU is 49 yes my HDL PU at that time was 49 micro mole per liter and my small LDL P was 233 an animal per liter which is low and at that time my oxidized LDL was 79 so if we do the quick calculation I think it comes out to be about 0.04 or a little bit less than that so that was my numbers then
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
my total cholesterol is 647 my ldl is 533 milligrams per deciliter as you can see my ldl particle number is three two eight three nanomole per liter which will make both tom uh day spring and peter atif fall out of their chairs my ldl size is 24.7 if you care about that you can see my hdl particle number is 50.6 micromole per liter if you care about that
my total cholesterol is 254 my triglycerides are very low at 68 my HDL is 64 essentially there is a one: one ratio there my vldl is 11 milligrams per deciliter my LDL is 179