Peter Attia· MD
in the 70s it was noticed that um cancer patients had a lot of DNA uh outside their cells in the blood
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in the 70s it was noticed that um cancer patients had a lot of DNA uh outside their cells in the blood
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in the late 40s um it was first identified that there was DNA in the blood outside of cells socalled cell-free DNA