The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when people are looking at hormonal numbers pay attention to the unit's nathan is giving his units for total in nanograms per deciliter and free in grams per ml so some of these numbers may sound a little different yeah and I've actually had these be in the same unit with different reference ranges and different results from different labs so these aren't particularly comparable I don't think I would just say check against the reference range from what I've seen
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.