The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
our sort of North Star is all cause mortality because you know that's the one thing that we know is easy to diagnose whether you're dead or not and how quickly that happens and so looking at how changes in certain markers would increase or decrease your risk of all-cause mortality so we've set like optimal reference ranges which are associated with the lowest risk of all-cause mortality
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.