The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the functional arm is actually an area that's actually growing a lot in academia it's actually called DWI or dweebs which stands for diffusion-weighted imaging with background subtraction and so what we're doing with dweebs is that we're actually looking at water at two points in time and so we're actually looking at it within about 60 microseconds of water motion
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.