The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
as much of a pain as it is for people whether it's dexa or even Labs you put a high value in being able to look at something like this where you can say let's look at historically let's monitor changes as opposed to like I got a deck so I'm just going to look at it this time
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I have kept a spreadsheet for you know better part of 12 Years where I log my dexa data and um I think you know it'll be interesting to go through some of that now
Trends matter you're treating what you see but you're you're mindful of the trends