The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
This is the other cool thing. This is why I love urine because I actually prefer urine over blood because I I would argue you get more functional information. Like, when you see elevated liver enzymes on a blood work, that's a clue, but it doesn't really tell you why. These type of tests can tell you more straight to the source of why you may see elevated liver enzymes.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.