The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if a doctor gets a report now he gets total cholesterol triglycerides non-hdlc ldlc hdlc five numbers do you think he actually looks at any of those numbers if he try he's trying to do a good job he does but let's say the triglycerides are high can he do anything with that nope because everything is based on ldlc so he's got in reality four numbers that are doing nothing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
a standard lipid panel spits out a bunch of numbers total cholesterol LDL cholesterol HDL cholesterol and if you're lucky vldl cholesterol non-hdl cholesterol and triglycerides that's basically the standard metric