We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
to the skeptic no I don't think the argument is super super strong that by fixing the homocysteine you're reducing cardiovascular risk that's definitely not an airtight argument I look at homocysteine and I say well look young healthy people have a homelessness knee on the average between 7 & 9 that's probably the sweet spot
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.