The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
We have clocks based on fundus We have clocks based on skin. We have clocks based on facial recognition. So the clocks are going to be uh measured you know using dozens of different uh biological variables. Uh any biome small company in the Bay Area is using it the tongue a tongue picture the old doctor looking at your tongue.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.