Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
how is Fon measured is there a is there a um a certified assay for measuring fist tattin I don't think so I think they're using their own like internal measurement as far as I know so they have like their own assay that they've developed so I don't really know so we don't actually know if there's there's there might not be a validated assay for measuring this hormone this protein rather yeah I I couldn't say for certain that it's actually measuring it correctly
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.