The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
frankly i care much more about those metrics than i care about your total body fat percent if your body fat percent is at the 40th percentile but your almi ffmi are at the 90th percentile and your vat is at the 10th percentile that's perfectly adequate
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if if I'm good when there's discordance between the almi and the ffmi we tend to prefer the almi because it's we actually have more data for almi it's also a slightly more pure measurement
the almi stands for appendicular lean mass index and again sometimes it's just spit out in the report but if it's not you would simply go to the report where it shows you lean mass for left leg right leg left arm right arm and you add those three up make sure they're in kilograms so if they're in pounds you have to convert them to kilograms divide by 2.204 and then divide that by your height in meters squared if that's given in inches or feet you have to make the conversion