The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and so by doing that what happens that you first look at water at one point in time and then you look at it at the second point in time and if it hasn't moved it's because it's not allowed to move it's effectively trapped between walls and so that could be because of the fact there's a tight cell membrane or it could be because components of a cell are preventing that water from moving
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.