Peter Attia· MD
So those guys are definitely shedding. So it should be detectable.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So those guys are definitely shedding. So it should be detectable.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in early stage patients it's often well less than you know 0.01 or 0.001 percent of the dna that that's from the cancer
in an advanced lung cancer patient might have one percent of the circulating dnas from is from the cancer