The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and people think about it more I would say right now for thinking about recurrence of cancer so how do you monitor someone who's had a previous cancer diagnosis you think they're all clear and seeing whether or not they've had a recurrence
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The other use case people have thought about is someone who might be at high risk of cancer so someone who's identified in whatever reason based on an exposure based on a genetic profile