Paul Saladino· MD
my triglycerides are 65 for a triglyceride hdl ratio of one and that is actually a very valuable set of lipids
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
my triglycerides are 65 for a triglyceride hdl ratio of one and that is actually a very valuable set of lipids
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So wouldn't you know it, right around that triglyceride to HDL ratio on the x-axis of 1.5 is that crossover.
The triglyceride to HDL ratio is an awesome surrogate.
The lower the triglyceride to HDL ratio was, the more it reflected a pattern A, the large buoyant, apparently less aogenic.