The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if we think that an average life expectancy should be 71 or something and we think that hey we're going to tolerate a person's gfr being in the low 40s when they're in their early 70s that's great but if we're trying to figure out a way to help people live and live well into their 90s or beyond that's that becomes a very unacceptable gfr
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.