Peter Attia· MD
for the liquid biopsies what everyone is doing is they're saying we have to have a hundred percent specificity we can't tell anyone who has the disease that they don't have it and that's the way it should be
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
for the liquid biopsies what everyone is doing is they're saying we have to have a hundred percent specificity we can't tell anyone who has the disease that they don't have it and that's the way it should be
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.