The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
could you for example image the lens and determine is glucose leaching into this lens does it contain more glucose than you would expect a normal individual to have in their lens might that be a screening technique for for diabetic disease but i think probably yes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i would see perturbations in the glucose migration into the lens way sooner than we would see architectural changes in the retinal microvasculature